Tuesday, March 2, 2010



THE STRAITS TIMES FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 26 2010 PAGE A27

MATA JELI : A PERSPECTIVE ON INDONESIAN AFFAIRS

Singing praises of Bluebird taxis
By Bruce Gale

PUBLIC transportation in Jakarta is widely acknowledged to be chaotic, uncomfortable and sometimes dangerous. So it is quite a surprise for newcomers to discover that the capital has a taxi service that is second to none in the region.

Bluebird taxis are ubiquitous in Jakarta. Of the almost 30,000 taxis in the capital, about 12,000 are painted in the familiar metallic blue and sport the company’s geese-like logo. Bluebird taxis arrive promptly when booked over the phone, and the company employs drivers who are polite and often competent in basic English. Many passengers can also relate stories of valuable items left in Bluebird taxis being returned to them after they contacted the company.

Private security consultants recommend Bluebird, particularly when travelling around the capital at night. So do some foreign government travel and trade websites. Indeed, the brand has such a peerless reputation in a country so often regarded as offering little more than second or third rate products and services that it seems reasonable to ask how it was accomplished.

The taxi service began in 1965, when two brothers began a rental car company called Chandra Taxi. The company has been trading under its current name since 1972, when the family matriarch Mutiara Djokosoetono mortgaged the family home in order to finance the purchase of the company’s first 25 taxis. Other transportation services now provided by Bluebird include executive taxi services (Silverbird) and chartered bus services. The company also offers logistics services (including freight forwarding) and runs holiday resorts.

Speaking to the The Straits Times earlier this month, company vice-president Sigit Priawan Djokosoetomo said the company owed its success to its commitment to honesty and good service, both to the customer and the drivers it employs.

It all sounds like public relations hype. But a study of the company’s history, together with interviews with various Bluebird taxi drivers in Jakarta who had no idea their passengers was a Straits Times journalist, has convinced me that it is basically true.

Like most companies aspiring to create a sense of pride and professionalism among their staff, Bluebird puts its drivers through a basic orientation course to familiarise them with company policies and procedures. There are also regular follow-up briefings at which drivers are encouraged to share ideas and experiences in dealing with unusual situations or difficult customers.

But the real reason for the company’s success seem to me to be the way this ethnic Chinese family-owned company treats its employees.

Bluebird maintains an unusual arrangements with drivers under which the latter receive a percentage of the total metered fare. Most other taxi companies in Jakarta and around the region - including those operating in Singapore - impose a flat rental fee instead.

Asked about the policy, Mr. Sigit explained that the company felt that its drivers should never be forced to go home empty-handed. But what if the taxi driver avoids using the meter? “We have 12,000 spies,” he replied. Bluebird drivers get rewards if they spot another Bluebird taxi not using the meter. With many Jakartans actively preferring Bluebird taxis over the competition, drivers also have a vested interest in protecting the company’s reputation.

Bluebird maintains 17 depots in Greater Jakarta. Each has its own clinic staffed by doctors - including dentist as well as ear, nose and throat specialist - all of whom are on Bluebird’s payroll. The company also runs its own health insurance which covers each driver’s immediate family. But these are not the only benefits enjoyed by employees. Several drivers The Straits Times spoke to noted that dormitories at the depots also allow those who live outside Jakarta to save on transport costs by working three or four days at a stretch before returning to their families.

For evidence of the success of the corporate culture in changing driver behaviour, Mr. Sigit referred to the situation in Bandung about three years ago, just before Bluebird entered the market. At that time, no taxi in the city offered metered service, and all had bad reputations. “We recruited the existing taxi drivers over there... We trained them. And the day they worked for our company, they switched behaviour. They knew that if they cheated, they would be sacked”.

Bluebird’s success in Jakarta has spawned numerous imitators, but none has yet managed to replicate the company’s winning formula. Struggling to remain profitable during the economic crisis of the late 1990s, President Taxi - formerly a market leader repainted its yellow taxis blue. Today, there are about 19 taxi companies operating in Jakarta and other Indonesian cities that have adopted a similar tactic. Some also display logos similar to Bluebird’s.

But perhaps the greatest compliment has come from Singapore. In November 2008, representatives from the Singapore Taxi Academy, the Taxi Operators Association and various Singapore-based taxi firms visited Jakarta to meet Bluebird executives and learn more about the reasons for the company’s success. Usually, it is the other way around.
bruceg@sph.com.sg

Monday, February 1, 2010

IS THERE A QUOTA FOR INDIAN MUSLIM RESTAURANTS?


Monday’s February, 2 edition of Johor Streets section had a news titled “City council enforcement officers told to buck up”.

What caught my attention was what Bandar Baru Uda (BBU) zone councillor, Mohd Sunawan Mohd Som who during MBJB’s first council meeting referring to the bombing of a restaurant in Taman Impian Stulang said “There has been speculation that bthe motive was jealousy. I don’t care what the motive was. I only know that MBJB licencing unit had not issued many new licences for Indian Muslim restaurants in the last five years. Yet, this company has opened 11 outlets with nine in areas under the jurisdiction of MBJB since opening of its first outlet in 2006”.

Would the Datuk Bandar Johor Bahru, Mohd Jaffar Awang clarify if there a quotas or restriction on licences for Indian Muslim restaurants. At least that’s what Mohd Sunawan seem to be implying.

Thursday, December 31, 2009

Comparison of Crime Index in Iskandar Malaysia

Monday, December 21, 2009

13 fined for offence at CIQ

13 fined for offence at CIQ
TAXI DRIVERS WORST THAN PUBLIC TOILETS

Such was the indignation felt by the Kuala Lumpur and Selangor Taxi Drivers Welfare Association Chairman M. Manickam about the Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri remark than taxi drivers were worst than public toilets, which made M. Manikam issue an ultimum to the Minister that either he apologise within a week or there will be a massive demonstration by 26,000 taxi drivers in front of the Prime Ministers office. That ultimum has ended. Thus, it now remains to be seen if M. Manikam will hold true to his word.

Of course earlier to this, the Chairman of the Executive Taxi Owners Association, Azmi Mohd Yatim was so incensed by the Minister’s remark that he not only demanded that the Minister withdraw his remark and apologise but also called upon the Prime Minister to replace the Minister with someone else.

However, the Minister was not being insolent or disrespectful but was merely stating the unpleasant truth about the bad behavior of our taxi drivers, not that our public toilets are any better.

Those flying into a rage and calling for the Minister’s scalp should first be reminded that in a survey published by The Expat magazine rated Malaysia taxi service as the worst among 23 countries surveyed. In the survey, Malaysian taxi drivers were among others labeled as “national disgrace”, “extortionist” and “a threat to tourist”. So what the Minister who has a penchant for blunt words and straight talking said about taxi drivers cannot be construed as being a disrespectful description.

Just what is the problem with taxi drivers? The taxi fare have been revised. With effect of August 1, 2009 the flag down rate now is RM3.00 instead of RM2.00. That is not all, the taxi meter also significantly jumps faster when the taxi is not moving or when caught in a jam. In fact, taxi drivers after the fare increase have reported a 30% rise in the earning. Despite this, it has still not stopped taxi drivers from continuing with their usual shenanigans in ripping of the passengers while providing a sub-standard taxi service.

The Chairman of Kuala Lumpur and Selangor Taxi Drivers Association and the Chairman of the Executive Taxi Owners Association who are enraged by the Ministers’ remarks should come to Johor Bahru and witness the startling truth. To say only a minority of taxi drivers cheat is an understatement. The fact is, the majority of the taxi drivers in Johor Bahru despite the revised taxi fare, refuse to use the meter and continue to cheat the public by charging excess fares, refusing or reluctant in returning the change, choosing destinations, refusing to take passengers to certain areas, covering the meter with towels, calendars or calling cards or not using the meter but informing the passenger of the fare after driving a few hundred yards and then asking the passenger to get out if the passenger does not agree with the taxi drivers demands.

Those who are demanding a public apology or threatening demonstration just have to go undercover and observe and experience how taxi drivers in Johor Bahru namely around City Square, Taman Pelangi, Wisma Persekutuan, Larkin Bus Terminal, Skudai bus stand, Taman Tun Aminah bus stand or even Kip Market Tampoi cheat the public.

The reason why most taxi drivers continue with their wayward ways is simply because policing and enforcement is grossly lacking. The Road Transport Dept and Commercial Vehicle Transport Board who are responsible for keeping errant cabbies in check conducts only periodic “operasi’s” and more often than not complain about lack of manpower and instead wait for the public to complain. Rightfully, The Commercial Vehicle Licensing Board (CVLB) instead of depending on the public to complain should go undercover and weed out the miscreant taxi drivers. How difficult can that be for CVLB ?

If the CVLB can be seen to be serious, non -compromising and start cancelling taxi permits and taxi licences of errant taxi drivers or their companies, trust me the standard of taxi service will immediately show an improvement. Then maybe the public toilets may be worse than the taxi drivers. Until then it is the taxi drivers !.

Sunday, December 20, 2009

KUALITI KERJA MBJB

Inilah gambar yang menunjukkan keadaan jalan di Jalan Titiwangsa 2, Taman Tampoi Indah.



Sebenarnya selepas dua minggu jalan merekah, kontraktor MBJB pada hari Sabtu 19.12.2009, telah membaiki dan menurap jalan yang merekah.

Inilah kualiti kerja kontraktor MBJB yang telah membaiki dan menurap jalan yang merekah.



Untuk makluman, jalan tersebut sudah kembali merekah.
52 TAHUN MERDEKA TETAPI TIDAK MENGENALI JALUR GEMILANG



Inilah gambar Jalur Gemilang yang menghiasi bangunan Majlis Perbandaran Johor Bahru Tengah sejak beberapa bulan.

Cuba lihat Jalur Gemilang. Ada apa-apa yang tidak kena dengan Jalur Gemilang yang menghiasi MPJBT?

Baik! Biar saya meletakkan gambar diatas secara melintang.



Dapat lihat apa kesilapan?

Yang menakjubkan ialah Pengetua serta semua warga kerja MPJBT tidak perasan dengan kesilapan yang telah berlaku. Malahan kita hendak tahu siapakah kontraktor bertauliah yang telah membekalkan bendera Jalur Gemilang kepada MPJBT.

JALUR GEMILANG BENDERA MALAYSIA
BERKIBAR MEGAH DIUDARA
APAKAH MPJBT SEMUA TELAH LUPA
BENTUK ASAL BENDERA KITA.